women’s satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: a one-blind randomized controlled trial study

نویسندگان

shahnaz barat obstetrics and gynecology department, babol university of medical sciences, babol, iran.

sedigheh esmaeilzadeh fatemezahra infertility and reproductive health research center, babol university of medical sciences, babol, iran.

masoumeh golsorkhtabaramiri obstetrics and gynecology department, babol university of medical sciences, babol, iran.

soraya khafri social medicine department, babol university of medical sciences, babol, iran

چکیده

background: the early postoperative feeding after caesarean section (c- section) has remained controversial. this study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed postcaesarean section oral feeding regarding gastrointestinal complications and patients postoperative satisfaction after c- section. methods: this clinical trial study was conducted on 200 pregnant women undergoing planned c-section under spinal anesthesia (registration number: irct: 138712211760n1). women were randomly divided in two groups group a (early feeding group) comprised of 101 patients who were encouraged to take oral fluid. if they tolerated, they continue semi-solid and solid foods starting 2 h after caesarean section. group b (delayed feeding group) comprised of 99 patients who were given oral fluid 8 h after surgery. after beginning of feeding the patients’ tolerance, first flatus, first defecation, beginning of regular diet, the length of hospital stay and also patient satisfaction level were evaluated in each group by visual scale analog (vas). results: the mean time of the first passage of flatus was 10.2±1.7 hours for the early oral feeding group versus 10.7±1.6 hours for the delayed feeding group and the difference was significant (p=0.03). duration to first defecation and length of hospital stay as well as patient satisfaction level did not differ significantly between the two groups.  conclusion: the results of this study suggest early postcaesarean feeding. it is well tolerated and helps return normal feeding habits.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Women’s satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: A one-blind randomized controlled trial study

 Background: The early postoperative feeding after caesarean section (C- section) has remained controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed postcaesarean section oral feeding regarding gastrointestinal complications and patients postoperative satisfaction after C- section. Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted on 200 p...

متن کامل

Women’s satisfaction in early versus delayed postcaesarean feeding: A one-blind randomized controlled trial study

BACKGROUND The early postoperative feeding after caesarean section (C- section) has remained controversial. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of early versus delayed postcaesarean section oral feeding regarding gastrointestinal complications and patients postoperative satisfaction after C- section. METHODS This clinical trial study was conducted on 200 pregnant women...

متن کامل

coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: a double blind randomized controlled trial

normal 0 false false false en-us x-none ar-sa background : coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. this study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. methods : in a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial inform...

متن کامل

Coblation versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND Coblation tonsillectomy is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of tonsillectomy. This study compares coblation and traditional tonsillectomy techniques in view of their advantages and complications. METHODS In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood lo...

متن کامل

Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Background: We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the termination of pregnancy with a live full-term fetus.Methods: This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was performed on 200 primiparous women with normal, singleton, full-term pregnancies candidated for the induction of labor. Sublingual and vaginal tablets cont...

متن کامل

randomized controlled trial study about compare of post operative complications after milligan morgan versus submucosal hemorrhoidectomy in patients that had hemorrhoidectomy in imam hossein hospital of shahrood in 1389-90

مقدمه: هموروئید یکی از شایعترین بیماریهای جراحی ناحیه آنورکتال است که با درد و خونریزی بروز می کند. کاهش بروز عوارض بعد از عمل علاوه بر افزایش رضایت بیمار منجر به کاهش مدت بستری و کاهش بار تحمیلی این عوارض بر روی اقتصاد می گردد. مطالعه حاضر،مقایسه ای از لحاظ عوارض بعد از عمل در دو روش جراحی هموروئید به صورت ساب موکوزال در طی دوره دو ماهه بعد از عمل که بیماران مورد پیگیری قرار می گیرند انجام می ...

منابع من

با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید


عنوان ژورنال:
caspian journal of internal medicine

جلد ۶، شماره ۲، صفحات ۶۷-۷۱

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023